MONDAY 22 JAN 2018 5:35 PM

FLUCTUATING TRUST A KEY FACTOR IN 2018 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER

Global communications and marketing firm, Edelman, has today released its 2018 Trust Barometer, affirming its continued focus on the measurement and evaluation of trust across various public institutions. Yet as the last two years remain, comparatively, the most volatile in the index’s eighteen-year history, declining trust and the turbulence of disinformation plague trust-building initiatives across the board.

Introduced by president and CEO, Richard Edelman, preliminary research highlighted, “A new phase in the loss of trust: the unwillingness to believe information, even from those closest to us.” Yet across a mixed bag of index figures and trends, Edelman’s observations specified an insidious danger in the maturation of disinformation, “Silence is now deeply dangerous – a tax on truth,” says Edelman.

The Edelman Trust Barometer, conducted by specialist research division, Edelman Intelligence, considers responses from a total of 33,000 people across 28 countries, segmented into a ‘General Online Population,’ ‘Informed Public,’ and ‘Mass Population.’ Yet this year’s research documented dramatic shifts in previously unaffected regions of trust measurement, manifested across significant divides between trust gainers and losers.

The United States and China, for example, remain two of the world’s leading economies, yet despite both nations having positive fiscal years, the US experienced a 37-point aggregate drop in trust across all institutions (government, business, media and NGOs), with China remaining top of both general and informed categories. America’s crisis in clarity however, is endemic of its tense diplomatic isolationism being at odds with its general population – manifested in a 14-point drop in government trust.

Elsewhere however, trust’s entanglement with truth hinges on the current malaise concerning information. With seven in every 10 respondents reporting concern over fake news, 59% of respondents struggle to assess the respectability of media organisations. Yet as global news’ fast-paced cycle often favours being first over being right, scepticism over media organisations’ position on news continues to spark concern, with 66% of respondents agreeing with a shift in reporting focus that favours attracting large audiences over concise reporting.

Yet despite strong debate over media’s classification as both publishers and platforms – illustrated in recent calls for Facebook and Alphabet’s Google and YouTube to take more responsibility over content across its sites – trust in journalism is up by 5 points in this year’s study, while trust platforms declined by 2 points.

Ben Boyd, president of practices, sectors and intellectual property at Edelman, says, “For 18 years, the Edelman Trust Barometer has asked respondents, ‘How much do you trust an institution to do what’s right?’ This year, for the first time, we also asked what their expectation are for the roles that each institution must fill in society. The most important individual trust-building mandates point to a belief that institutions must work singularly as well as in partnership to restore trust and create a stronger social fabric.”

For a closer look at the findings, click here.

 

 

For more from Communicate magazine, follow us on Twitter @Communicatemag