Skip to content

Internal comms doesn’t need more noise, it needs more connection

2 min

As internal communications becomes ever more digital, the smartest organisations are rediscovering the value of face-to-face connection.

 

  • Joe Gilliver is founder and executive producer at The Chameleon Agency 

  • Internal Comms

Internal communications teams have never had more tools at their disposal. There are intranets, employee apps, emails, newsletters, video updates, Teams channels, webinars, WhatsApp groups and no doubt a few more channels knocking about in the background. Yet, for all that choice, a simple question stands – are employees actually feeling any more connected?  

In many organisations, internal comms is still treated as a distribution challenge. Has the message gone out? Has it been uploaded? Has it been included in the weekly round-up? Has it been cascaded properly by line managers? Those are all fair questions, but they convey the idea that communication is just a tick-box exercise.  

The better question for internal comms teams in 2026 is not, “Have we communicated this?” Instead, it’s, “Has it actually made people feel more informed, more involved and more connected?” or, put even simpler, did they actually get the message we were sending.  

Face-to-face still matters 

We recently commissioned research with more than 1,000 UK employees which found that despite years of investment in digital platforms, tools, intranets and mass messaging, face-to-face conversations remain the communication method most likely to make workers feel connected to their organisation. 62% put it as the top communication method for making them feeling connected with their organisation, with 89% placing it in their top three. 

This isn’t because digital channels are failing – they’re not, they’re vital and absolutely have their place, particularly in hybrid businesses, dispersed teams and organisations where people are rarely in the same room at the same time. But it does suggest that digital communication works best when it supports human connection, rather than trying to replace it. 

The danger is that organisations become brilliant at broadcasting and less good at actually connecting. Messages are polished, (or increasingly, pulled together by AI) approved and sent. Leaders have said their piece and the update has technically happened, but has it? 

Our research found that more than a third of employees rarely read mass internal communications and almost half said communication from their organisation feels corporate rather than authentic. 

That word ‘corporate’ is the crux of the connection problem. It doesn’t necessarily mean the communication is bad – it might be clear, accurate and carefully written – but if it feels too distant or too disconnected from employees’ day-to-day reality, people switch off and once people switch off, sending more of it isn’t going to solve the problem. 

Line managers leading the way 

This is where line managers become so important. 72% of employees are happy with how their manager communicates with them, compared with 60% who say the same of senior leadership. 

Senior leaders play a crucial role in setting direction. People want to hear from them and want the visibility, clarity and reassurance they can bring, but line managers are often the people who make communication feel real. They are the ones employees ask all the questions to after the message has been sent: “What does this mean for us?” or “Is this actually going to change anything?” They translate the big organisational message into something people can understand in the context of their own work life. 

So, if managers are one of the most trusted routes to employees, we need to stop treating them as the final link in a cascade and start treating them as a central part of the communication strategy. That means giving them more than a briefing note five minutes before everyone else gets the announcement and instead giving them context, confidence and space to have proper conversations with their teams. 

Seeing is believing 

There’s a big difference between being told something and feeling part of it. The first can happen through an email, while the second usually needs some form of interaction. 

That might be a team discussion, a manager-led conversation, a leadership roadshow, an internal event or a shared employee experience that brings people together around a common purpose. These things can sometimes be dismissed as the “nice to have” part of internal comms, but the data tells us that they are becoming more important, not less. 

When employees say communication feels too corporate, the answer is not to rewrite everything in a more casual tone, but to create more moments that allow that communication to feel more human. Where people can see leaders, ask questions, hear the thinking behind decisions and understand the role they play in the bigger picture. 

That is also where live experiences have real value. A well-designed internal event or workshop is not just a chance to put people in a room and run through a slide deck. At its best, it creates shared understanding and gives people a collective moment. It helps turn strategy and messages from something written on a page into something people can see, hear and feel.  

For internal comms teams, that means designing communication around connection, not just volume and creating a space where – if not all, then the most important – messages at a minimum, are delivered through shared experiences, not emails.